LuckyMouse, TA428, HyperBro, Tmanger and ShadowPad linked in Mongolian supply-chain attack

ESET researchers discovered that chat software called Able Desktop, part of a business management suite popular in Mongolia and used by 430 government agencies in Mongolia (according to Able), was used to deliver the HyperBro backdoor (commonly used by LuckyMouse)the Korplug RAT (also known as PlugX), and a RAT called Tmanger (which was first documented by NTT Security and was used during Operation Lagtime IT campaigns attributed to TA428 by Proofpoint). A connection with the ShadowPad backdoor, which is now used by at least five different threat actors, was also found. 

Two different trojanized installers, as well as a likely compromised update system, were used to deliver the payloadstheAbleupdate system has beensince at least 2020 and trojanized installers delivered since at least May 2018 

Additionally, yesterday, Avast published a blogpost documenting a campaign targeting government agencies and a national data center in Mongolia. During that campaign, the attackers compromised an unknown company that was providing government institutions in East Asia and leveraged that compromise to deliver HyperBro by emailWe believe that compromised company was Able, as the filename used in that malicious email attachment is probably AbleTimeAccess_Update.exeand we observed such file being used to drop the same HyperBro sample as described in Avast’s blogpost. 

A diagram summarizing the connections between LuckyMouse, TA428 and the ShadowPad backdoor C&C infrastructure is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Summary of the connections between LuckyMouse, TA428 and the ShadowPad backdoor

Regarding the attribution of Operation StealthyTrident, considering that HyperBro is commonly attributed to LuckyMouse, that Tmanger was attributed to TA428 and that it uses one of the ShadowPad C&C servers, multiple competing hypotheses exist: 

  • LuckyMouse has access to Tmanger and ShadowPad. 
  • LuckyMouse share its access to the compromised Able Desktop update server with the TA428 group or some other group having access to Tmanger. 
  • HyperBro is now shared with TA428 or some other group having access to Tmanger and ShadowPad. 
  • LuckyMouse and TA428 are subgroups of the same threat actor. 

Although originally only known to be used by the Winnti Group, it should also be noted here that since at least October 2019, ShadowPad has been shared amongst multiple threat actors including the Winnti GroupCactusPeteTICKIceFog and KeyBoy. 

Additional elements regarding the connection between Tmanger and TA428 will be published in a second blogpost documenting another campaign where the attackers used both Tmanger and ShadowPad. 

We called this campaign Operation StealthyTrident because the attackers make extensive use of a three-pronged “trident side-loading technique. 

Compromised Able Desktop  

Able Desktop is chat software included as part of the Able business management suite used in Mongolia. It is a Chromium-based JavaScript app making use of the NodeJS library. According to Able, their software suite is used by 430 government agencies in Mongolia. 

In mid-2018, we observed a first occurrence of the legitimate Able Desktop application being used to download and execute HyperBro. HyperBro is a backdoor commonly attributed to LuckyMouse (also known as Emissary Panda or APT27). Able Desktop was also used to download and execute Tmanger; in that case, the Able Desktop software itself was not trojanized (i.e. it did not contain malicious code). The most likely hypothesis is that the Able Desktop update system was compromised. 

In addition to legitimate Able Desktop applications used to drop and execute HyperBro, likely using its update system, we also found two Able Desktop installers that were actually trojanized and contained the HyperBro backdoor and the Korplug RAT. The first occurrence of this trojanized Able Desktop installer dates back to December 2017. A timeline of these events is shown in Figure 2. 

Figure 2. Timeline of the various implants used with either a trojanized Able Desktop installer or likely delivered through Able Desktop update

We notified Able about these compromises. 

Able Desktop update mechanism 

To update itself, Able Desktop downloads the update installer through HTTPS. The code responsible for the update is shown in Figure 3. 

Figure 3. JavaScript code responsible for Able Desktop updates

The downloaded update installer is saved to %USERPROFILE%DocumentsAbleAble Desktop.exe. Once downloaded, the installer is executed. In the case of a legitimate update installer, a new version of Able Desktop will be installed.  We observed, however, that starting in mid-2018, the executable downloaded wasn’t a legitimate installer, but rather the HyperBro backdoor. Since, in that case, the executable is not an Able Desktop installer but plain malware, no update installation takes place and HyperBro is executed instead and Able Desktop is not updated anymore. 

Multiple elements support the hypothesis of a compromise of the update server: 

  • The filename and the path used to download HyperBro are the filename and path used by the update system. 
  • The update is downloaded through HTTPS, so a maninthemiddle attack is unlikely. 
  • HyperBro was dropped on all computers using Able Desktop during the same timeframe as previous legitimate updates. 
  • The malicious Able Desktop.exe is dropped by the real Able Desktop software and not malware masquerading as Able Desktop. 
  • No legitimate updates have been installed since the beginning of the campaign. 

We believe this is enough to state that the update mechanism was compromised. It should be noted that Able Desktop has multiple update servers, some of them hosted at customer organizations. Since we have no information on which update server was used by these victims, we don’t know whether Able was compromised, or one of their customer’s update servers.  

The list of update servers used by Able Desktop is shown iFigure 4. We can see from that list that Able Desktop is indeed used by several government entities such as the Mineral Resource Authority of Mongolia, the Ministry of Justice and Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Construction and Urban Development, the Development Bank of Mongolia or the Mongolian State University of Education.

Then, in July 2020, we saw a shift from HyperBro being delivered by the update system to a backdoor attributed to TA428 and called Tmanger. 

Trojanized Able Desktop 

In addition to HyperBro and Tmanger being downloaded by legitimate Able Desktop software, we also found two different trojanized installersIt is unknown to us whether these installers were downloadable from the Able website or from another source.  

Able Desktop installers, both legitimate and trojanized, are 7-Zip SFX installers and are not signed. In the case of trojanized installers, the legitimate Able Desktop software is bundled with either HyperBro or Korplug. The payload and its sideloading host are packaged in a data1.dat file which is a 7-Zip SFX archive while Able Desktop is packaged in data.dat file which is an Advanced Installer.  The content of the trojanized installer is summarized in Figure 5. The same IntgStat.exe sideloading host and pcalocalresloader.dll are used in both the root of the Able Desktop.exe archive and data1.dat archive. 

Figure 5. Trojanized Able Desktop installer content

The 7-Zip SFX installer first executes IntgStat.exe, a legitimate Symantec executable, which is a DLL sideloading host used to load pcalocalresloader.dll. This DLL is used to decrypt and load the XOR-encoded payload stored in thumb.db. This payload, XOR encoded with 0x04, once mapped into memory by the payload loader, will decompress and execute an embedded, LZNT1compressed PE executable that is used trename data.dat (the legitimate installer) and data1.dat (the malicious payload) as Able Desktop.exe and data1.exe respectively, and then execute them.  

Once executed, the newly renamed data1.exe 7-Zip SFX archive will extract its contents and execute the second IntgStat.exe sideloading host, which then loads pcalocalresloader.dll. Again pcalocalresloader.dll is used to load the XOR-encoded payload stored in the thumb.db file. As before,  this payload will decompress and execute an embedded LZNT1compressed PE executable, which is actually HyperBro.  

Note that, in the case of the Able Desktop installer trojanized with Korplug, the same sideloading host and DLL are used to execute data1.dat, while the sideloading host used to execute Korplog itself is not IntgStat.exebut siteadv.exe – a legitimate executable from McAfee – and the loader DLL is called siteadv.dll. Apart from this change of sideloading host, the payload delivery mechanism is the same. 


The HyperBro backdoor is LuckyMouse’s custom backdoor used since at least 2013 and in continuous development. The variant being used here is similar to the variant described by Palo Alto Networks and KasperskyHyperBro was delivered to victims by both the legitimate Able Desktop software and a trojanized Able Desktop installer. 

Similar to the version used with the trojanized Able Desktop installer, in the case of the HyperBro implant downloaded by the legitimate Able Desktopits first stage consists in a 7-Zip SFX containing: 

  • thinprobe.exe, a legitimate Symantec executable used for DLL sideloading 
  • thinprobe.dllHyperBro loader 
  • thumbs.dbthe XOR-encoded payload 

HyperBro’s loader DLLthinprobe.dll, is executed by DLL sideloading using the thinprobe.exe executablewhich is a legitimate, signed Symantec executable. While the sideloading host used with the downloaded HyperBro is different, the DLL used to decode and execute the thumbs.db payload is exactly the same. 

This technique is very similar to the threepronged trident attack reported by a Kaspersky researcher. Both thinprobe.exe and Intgstat.exe sideloading hosts were previously used by LuckyMouse to load HyperBro. 

Note, however, that contrary to previously documented HyperBro droppers employing such a trident, the payload here is not Shikata GNai encoded but XOR encoded with the value 0x04. 

The C&C URL of the HyperBro implant used with the trojanized Able Desktop installer is https://developer.firefoxapi[.]com/ajax, while the C&C URL used by the one downloaded by the legitimate Able Desktop is https://139.180.208[.]225/ajax.

Considering HyperBro’s compilation timestamps, the version used with the trojanized installer was compiled Fri Dec 08 05:22:23 2017 while the version downloaded by Able Desktop was compiled Mon Mar 11 03:23:54 2019. This suggests that the trojanized installer was used before the version downloaded by the Able Desktop updaterThe trojanized installer was first seen in our telemetry in May 2018, while the version downloaded by Able Desktop was first seen in June 2020 (see the timeline iFigure 2).  


The Korplug RAT (also known as PlugXis used by multiple different threat groups. In this case, it was only delivered via the trojanized Able Desktop installer and we have seen no occurrence of Korplug being downloaded by legitimate Able Desktop software. 

As mentioned previously, and similar to installers trojanized with HyperBroKorplug is bundled in the installer with the legitimate Able Desktop and executed twice via the trident model by DLL sideloading using IntgStat.exe as host executable and then siteadv.exe. The identical DLL is used to decode and execute the thumbs.db XOR-encoded payload as the one used with the installer trojanized with HyperBro, providing a strong link between these two trojanized installers. 

The C&C address used by Korplug is 45.77.173[.]124:443. Interestingly, this address was also used by a CobaltStrike implant targeting a school in Mongolia during the same timeframe. 

Its compilation timestamp (Sun Dec 08 06:22:34 2019as well as the compilation timestamp of the installer (Wed Sep 04 16:52:04 2019) suggest that it was used after the Able Desktop installer trojanized with HyperBro and before HyperBro was downloaded by legitimate Able Desktop software. See the timelinin Figure 2. 


Tmanger is a RAT that was first documented by NTT Security and that was used in Operation Lagtime IT which was attributed to TA428 by Proofpoint. It is called Tmanger because it iapparently the name given by its developer, as we can see from its PDB path, as an example: 

c:userswastondesktop20190403_tmanger20191118 tm_new 1.0releasemloaddll.pdb 

Considering the variant we observed during Operation StealthyTrident no PDB path was present but it is still very similar to the one documented by NTT Security in their blogpost. As an example of similarity between the two samplesthe connection procedure used by one of the Tmanger samples documented by NTT Security (14140782A68FF20000C7E9F58336620A65D4D168) and the one dropped by Able Desktop are shown side-by-side iFigure 6.

Figure 6. Comparison of the connection routine in Tmanger sample dropped by legitimate Able Desktop (left) and one of the samples documented by NTT SecurityOne notable difference is that in the case of the Able Desktop variant, Tmanger is packaged is one single executable, while the variant described by NTT Security consists of three DLLs.

ESET telemetry shows the first download of this Tmanger variant by the legitimate Able Desktop software in July 2020. Tmanger replaced HyperBro on that system and HyperBro was not seen downloaded to it after that. 

The C&C addresses used by this Tmanger implant, downloaded by Able Desktop, are stored in an RC4-encrypted configuration and are the following: 

  • 45.77.55[.]145:80 
  • 45.77.55[.]145:443 
  • 45.77.55[.]145:8080 

The communication protocol is TCP and the messages are RC4 encrypted. 

Interestingly, the first address is part of the ShadowPad network infrastructure and, to the best of our knowledge, none of these addresses are overlapping with LuckyMouse infrastructure. 


ESET Research discovered a campaign targeting Mongolian organizations that relied on compromised Able Desktop installers and compromises to the Able update system to deliver HyperBro, Korplug and Tmanger malware. 

This campaign shows a connection with the ShadowPad backdoor, as we observed network infrastructure overlaps between the ShadowPad C&C network infrastructure and one of the Tmanger C&C addresses. 

Apart from the use of HyperBrodeveloped and commonly used by LuckyMouse, we found no significant overlap with the LuckyMouse toolset or network infrastructure. Does this mean that LuckyMouse has access to ShadowPad and Tmanger or did LuckyMouse share their access to a compromised Able Desktop update server with the TA428 group? Another hypothesis could be that, similarly to ShadowPad, HyperBro inow shared with other threat actors. Finally, one last hypothesis could be that LuckyMouse and TA428 are closely related threat actors or are actually the same. 

Indicators of Compromise can also be found on GitHub. For any inquiries, or to make sample submissions related to the subject, contact us at: [email protected]. 


The author would like to thank Matthieu Faou, who contributed to this research. 


ESET detection names 


Trojanized Able Desktop 


Payload loader 








C&C domains 


C&C IP addresses 




MITRE ATT&CK techniques 

Tactic  ID  Name  Description 
Initial   Access  T1195.002  Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain  One of the Able update servers was likely compromised in order to deploy HyperBro and Tmanger. 
Execution  T1204.002  User Execution: Malicious File  Able Desktop trojanized installer is executed by the user. 
Persistence  T1574.002  Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading  HyperBro, Korplug and Tmanger are executed via DLL side-loading. 
Defense Evasion  T1140  Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information  HyperBro and Korplug payloads are XOR encoded. 
Tmanger configuration is RC4 encrypted. 
T1574.002  Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading  HyperBro and Korplug side-loading hosts are legitimate, signed executables from trusted security vendors. 
Collection  T1056.001  Input Capture: Keylogging  Tmanger supports keylogging. 
T1113  Screen Capture  Tmanger supports screen capture. 
Command   And   Control  T1573.001  Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography  Tmanger messages are RC4 encrypted. 
T1008  Fallback Channels  Tmanger can fallback to a secondary C&C. 
T1095  Non-Application Layer Protocol  Tmanger   communicates using raw TCP. 
T1071.001  Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols  HyperBro communication protocol is HTTP. 
Exfiltration  T1041  Exfiltration Over C2 Channel  Tmanger can exfiltrate files via a dedicated command. 

Note: This table was built using version 8 of the MITRE ATT&CK framework.